A Morphometric and radiographic assessment of the incisive fossa: thresholds for improving accuracy of diagnosis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5327/2525-5711.481

Keywords:

Incisive fossa, Nasopalatine duct cyst, Occlusal radiography, Cone-beam computed tomography

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to determine radiographic measurements of the incisive fossa and to establish thresholds that distinguish normal anatomical variations from possible nasopalatine duct cysts. A morphometric evaluation was carried out using dry human skulls, maxillary occlusal radiographs, and cone beam computed tomography. Methods: Sixty-six dry human skulls were examined through direct measurements and occlusal radiographs. Cone beam computed tomography was performed when the width of the incisive fossa was six millimeters or greater. Width and length values obtained through the three techniques were compared using the Tukey–Kramer test, considering a significance level of p less than 0.05. Results: The mean width and length of the incisive fossa were 5.18 millimeters and 8.22 millimeters in dry skulls, 5.05 millimeters and 9.23 millimeters in occlusal radiographs, and

6.00 millimeters and 6.66 millimeters in cone beam computed tomography. Width values did not differ significantly between dry skulls and radiographs, while length values showed significant differences. Maxillary occlusal radiographs produced reliable width estimates and should be used as the imaging method. Conclusions: The width of the incisive fossa is a critical parameter for distinguishing normal anatomical variations from possible nasopalatine duct cysts. Radiolucent areas measuring 6 mm or less in width represent normal anatomical variations, whereas widths between 6 and 10 mm require further evaluation, and widths greater than 10 mm suggest nasopalatine duct cysts.

References

1. Anneroth G, Hall G, Stuge U. Nasopalatine duct cyst. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986 Oct;15(5):572-80. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9785(86)80061-8.

2. Bodin I, Isacsson G, Julin P. Cysts of the nasopalatine duct. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986 Dec;15(6):696-706. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9785(86)80110-7.

3. Chamda RA, Shear M. Dimensions of incisive fossae on dry skulls and radiographs. Int J Oral Surg. 1980 Dec;9(6):452-7. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9785(80)80075-5.

4. Dedhia P, Dedhia S, Dhokar A, Desai A. Nasopalatine duct cyst. Case Rep Dent. 2013;2013:869516. doi: 10.1155/2013/869516.

5. Barros CCDS, Santos HBP, Cavalcante IL, Rolim LSA, Pinto LP, et al. Clinical and histopathological features of nasopalatine duct cyst: A 47-year retrospective study and review of current concepts. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018 Feb;46(2):264-268. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.11.014.

6. Escoda Francolí J, Almendros Marqués N, Berini Aytés L, Gay Escoda C. Nasopalatine duct cyst: report of 22 cases and review of the literature. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2008 Jul 1;13(7):E438-43.

7. Etoz M, Sisman Y. Evaluation of the nasopalatine canal and variations with cone-beam computed tomography. Surg Radiol Anat. 2014 Oct;36(8):805-12. doi: 10.1007/s00276-014-1259-9.

8. Falci SG, Verli FD, Consolaro A, et al. Morphological characterization of the nasopalatine region in human fetuses and its association to pathologies. J Appl Oral Sci. 2013;21(3):250-5.

9. Hopper-Hall, H. Cyst of developmental origin in the premaxillary region with special reference to their diagnosis. Br Denta J. 1938;65:405–434.

10. Nonaka CF, Henriques AC, de Matos FR, de Souza LB, Pinto LP. Nonodontogenic cysts of the oral and maxillofacial region: demographic profile in a Brazilian population over a 40-year period. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Jun;268(6):917-22. doi: 10.1007/s00405-010-1458-x

11. Perumal CJ. An unusually large destructive nasopalatine duct cyst: a case report. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2013 Mar;12(1):100-4. doi: 10.1007/s12663-011-0201-5.

12. Schiff BS, Kringstein G, Stoopack JC. An extremely large and facially distorting nasopalatine duct cyst. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1969;27(5):590-594. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(69)90088-7.

13. Suter VG, Sendi P, Reichart PA, Bornstein MM. The nasopalatine duct cyst: an analysis of the relation between clinical symptoms, cyst dimensions, and involvement of neighboring anatomical structures using cone beam computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Oct;69(10):2595-603. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.11.032.

14. Suter VG, Warnakulasuriya S, Reichart PA, Bornstein MM. Radiographic volume analysis as a novel tool to determine nasopalatine duct cyst dimensions and its association with presenting symptoms and postoperative complications. Clin Oral Investig. 2015 Sep;19(7):1611-8. doi: 10.1007/s00784-014-1391-2.

15. Sane VD, Gadre KS, Halli R, Singh V, Doshi P, Saddiwal R, et al. Role of cone-beam computed tomography in diagnosis and management of nasopalatine duct cyst. J Craniofac Surg. 2014 Jan;25(1):e92-4. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000000427.

16. Beshtawi KR. Morphology and dimensions of the nasopalatine canal in Palestinian patients assessed using cone beam computed tomography. Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 17;15(1):13248. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-97392-7.

17. Rai S, Misra D, Misra A, Khatri M, Kidwai S, et al. Significance of Morphometric and Anatomic Variations of Nasopalatine Canal on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Anterior Functional Zone - A Retrospective Study. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Jan-Jun;11(1):108-114. doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_283_20.

18. Aydin KC, Gaş S. Anatomical and Morphological Assessment of Nasopalatine Canal in Pediatric and Adolescent Population via Cone Beam Computed Tomography. J Craniofac Surg. 2021 Sep 1;32(6):1994-1998. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000007476.

19. Linjawi AI, Othman MA, Dirham AA, Ghoneim SH, Aljohani SR, Dause RR, et al. Morphological evaluation of the incisive canal with reference to gender and age: A cone-beam computed tomography study. Niger J Clin Pract. 2021 Nov;24(11):1596-1601. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_40_21.

20. Janovic A, Bracanovic D, Antic S, Markovic-Vasiljkovic B. Morphological CBCT parameters for an accurate differentiation between nasopalatine duct cyst and the normal nasopalatine canal. Head Face Med. 2024 Sep 28;20(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13005-024-00458-6.

21. Chatzipetros E, Tsiklakis K, Donta C, Damaskos S, Angelopoulos C. Morphological Assessment of Nasopalatine Canal Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography: A Retrospective Study of 124 Consecutive Patients. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 May 18;13(10):1787. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13101787.

22. Demiralp KÖ, Kurşun-Çakmak EŞ, Bayrak S, Sahin O, Atakan C, Orhan K. Evaluation of Anatomical and Volumetric Characteristics of the Nasopalatine Canal in Anterior Dentate and Edentulous Individuals: A CBCT Study. Implant Dent. 2018 Aug;27(4):474-479. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000794.

23. Swanson KS, Kaugars GE, Gunsolley JC. Nasopalatine duct cyst: an analysis of 334 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1991 Mar;49(3):268-71. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(91)90217-a.

Downloads

Published

2026-11-12

How to Cite

1.
Fernandes PM, Correia-Neto IJ, Torregrossa VR, Faustino ISP, Santos-Silva AR, Rossi AC, et al. A Morphometric and radiographic assessment of the incisive fossa: thresholds for improving accuracy of diagnosis. J Oral Diagn [Internet]. 2026 Nov. 12 [cited 2026 Nov. 13];. Available from: https://www.joraldiagnosis.com/revista/article/view/481

Issue

Section

Original Article